shewhomust: (puffin)
[personal profile] shewhomust
I've written a short, professional post in our company web log about how [livejournal.com profile] durham_rambler and I came to build an instant web site for the campaign against branding children's books as suitable for children of specific ages. This is the unprofessional post, in which I get to squee about what fun it has been for us, watching the messages of support come flooding in - because it's [livejournal.com profile] durham_rambler's mailbox that they flood into. Check the list - it's constantly being updated.

So at intervals through the last week, I've been hearing squawks from downstairs, as some of the authors we most admire are writing to us - strictly, I suppose, since I'm the heavy reader of the two of us, some of the authors I most admire are writing to him, and there'll be an occasional query: "Nina Bawden?" The coolness of working for Anne Fine (as for many other clients) is a familiar feature of the job; the coolness of corresponding with Philip Pullman on this campaign could have been anticipated; but we're receiving messages from Terry Pratchett, Neil Gaiman and Peter Dickinson - not to mention that the campaign is now backed by all five Children's Laureates. This is not to underrate the value to the campaign of the support of such professionals as [livejournal.com profile] fjm and [livejournal.com profile] pnh (we're a Sidelight in Making Light!), it's pure fanboy pleasure.

The name that makes fanboys and fangirls of us all, though, is Alan Garner. Alan Garner! Anne Fine has managed to impress her daughter: "'Are you writing to Alan Garner? The Alan Garner? Blimey, Mum!'" Neil Gaiman is thrilled: "(I got a crazy thrill seeing Alan Garner in the comments -- an author whose books work if you're nine and work if you're twelve, and work if you're seventeen, and work if you're forty: they just work in a different way each time.)" And that goes double for me!

Date: 2008-06-08 12:00 pm (UTC)
ext_12745: (Default)
From: [identity profile] lamentables.livejournal.com
I didn't know it was you wot did that! It must be nice to undertake a job that brings so much squee :)

Date: 2008-06-08 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Hey, we just built the web site - but, yes, I love my job!

Date: 2008-06-08 12:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gillpolack.livejournal.com
Let me add squee. Also, let me say how glad I am you're doing this. Too many children *believe* when someone says "You can't read this" and it shapes their reading, plus it means some of them think "If I'm not allowed to do something as simple as read a book, maybe I can't do other things."

Date: 2008-06-08 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Let me add squee.

Can't have too much squee! Plus, thanks for posting about this - I don't know if Australian publishers are trying the same thing?

Date: 2008-06-09 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gillpolack.livejournal.com
To be honest, I didn't both checking. This is largely because when something becomes common in both the US and the UK book universes, the Australian tends to follow suit. All books sold in the UK to the Commonwealth come straight here, too.

Date: 2008-06-08 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] desperance.livejournal.com
Hee. I just clicked through to see how much the list had grown - and there's Ariel Dorfman. Ariel Dorfman! This is beyond cool. It was cool before. Now it's heading off into the outer reaches of the solar system. Alas: in space, no one can hear you squee.

Date: 2008-06-08 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Just in, DWJ.

Alas: in space, no one can hear you squee.

Ain't no alas about it! Some of us are trying to keep our professional cool here.

Date: 2008-06-08 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] janni.livejournal.com
What they said! I didn't know you were part of this, either!

Too many parents already convinced their kids can only read things that are exactly the right age, nothing older or younger. We don't need more of that, or parents making kids put books back on account of the level on the cover.

And of course, if one is an involved parent--or, alternately, a parent who trusts one's children--it's a non-issue.

Date: 2008-06-08 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
A very small part.

Date: 2008-06-08 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com
Awesome! Awe-frickin-some!

Date: 2008-06-08 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karinmollberg.livejournal.com
Blimey! Oh, having messages from Terry Pratchett... cryptic or non-so?

Date: 2008-06-08 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shewhomust.livejournal.com
Brief and to the point - as are most of them; I don't want to exaggerate my part in all this. I'm just absurdly pleased to be here at all...

Date: 2008-06-08 08:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] valydiarosada.livejournal.com
Keep up the good work!

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314 151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 07:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios