shewhomust: (Default)
Today is cold and grey, and if we had any thoughts about going out, they have vanished.

Last Sunday, though, last Sunday was glorious, and we visited Crook Hall
The person who checked our passes boasted of the tree peony (a huge bloom, rather blotched and blowsy) and the Himalayan poppy (just the one, but they are very proud of it because apparently it is quite hard to get them to bloom). I was more impressed by a fine cluster of wild garlic (which has an apologetic sign in it: This garden in the process of remodelling - oh, well). Randomly, my favourite picture was of some lingering blossom:

Blossom


There is a new sculpture of a toad, to replace the old wooden one, which was rotting, and has been put somewhere he can rot peacefully and productively; the new, metal toad is, inevitably, by Graeme Hopper. There is a moorhen on the pool. And there is a new second-hand bookshop, but I didn't buy anything (though I did photograph a copy of Pride and Prejudice for the previous post).


'Twas on a Wednesday morning
The electrician plumber came
We now have a fully flushing toilet in the upstairs bathroom. Just in time, because -


- we had a house guest for the end of the week:
Frances's three children, whose homes are scattered across the country, came to Durham to finalise her funeral arrangements, and make a start on clearing her house (in which they had lived as children). Their initial intention was for all three of them to stay at the house, but it would be a squeeze, especially since (and I find this rather sweet, both irrational and entirely understandable) no-one wanted to sleep in their mother's bed. So [personal profile] durham_rambler suggested to L. (middle 'child', with whom he maintains contact on - Bluesky, I think) that he should stay with us. Which worked very well: a practical, rather than a social, visit, but with some time for conversation, those peculiar conversations you have at these times with people who have known you not terribly well for all their lives...


Thursday evening, a civic event:
[personal profile] durham_rambler was invited, as a Parish Councillor, to the opening of 'Two Tales', a pop-up outpost of Seven Stories, the national centre for children's books in Newcastle. One of the many empty units in the shopping centre has been repurposed into a bookshop cum café cum events/ outreach venue: not the aspect of Seven Stories that most interests me, but surely a good thing nonetheless. The gathering was more civic than literary: no conversations about children's books, more (still) about the local elections. [personal profile] durham_rambler commiserated with one unsuccessful Labour candidate: "Sorry you weren't elected - " "I'm not!" was the reply, and I see his point. I almost left without buying a book (which would have been rude); we were already outside when I spotted in the window a supply of a book about illustrations in the Seven Stories collection, and had to go back in again.


Saturday was Eurovision!
But I have run out of time, so that'll have to wait...
shewhomust: (Default)
Context )

Book-lovers could have quite a competition, collecting and identifying colophons, and asking each other what publishers were represented by an Antarctic bird, a windmill, an urn of flowers, a fountain, a sea-bird and an open book bearing a Latin phrase.


The Atlantic bird is the easy one: there's only one publisher it can be. I recognised the windmill as Heinemann, too. I could picture, but not place, both the urn of flowers and the fountain, but I had to leaf through a number of books before I tracked them down to Jonathan Cape and Collins. Who, though, is represented by the sea-bird? It could, of course, be any one of the Penguin / Allen Lane imprints, and the more I think of it, the more I incline to this conclusion, because surely even by 1950, Puffin books were, as Francis Spufford puts it " the department of the welfare state responsible for the distribution of narrative". That just leaves the open book. Again, I can picture it, but not place it, and I'll need to use the steps to reach my copies. But this history mentions nothing of the kind, and without using the word 'colophon' describes the adoption of the dolphin and anchor -

- which brings me back to Geoffrey Trease, whose challenge continues:
This kind of trade-mark is almost as old as printing itself. Aldus Manutius of Venice used a dolphin entwined with an anchor. It was he...

but modestly does not say that he had recently published a novel in which two intrepid young people seek out a lost manuscript for Aldus to publish.




Celebratory

May. 5th, 2025 06:13 pm
shewhomust: (Default)
After the count on Friday, since we were halfway to J's house, we took the roundabout route home, and called in for a cup of tea. And I'm glad we did, even though we then had a bit of a rush to make the Live to Your Living Room gig we had booked: luckily the start time was not the advertised 7.30 but 8 o' clock, and we used the extra half hour to inveigle our too-smart-by-half tv into showing us the live YuoTube stream.

Breathless, but worth it: a hybrid concert, with Nancy Kerr, James Fagan and Tim van Eyken, not a line-up I'd met before. It seems they used to play together twenty or so years ago, when they all lived on narrowboats, then other things happened - but now Tim van Eyken has moved to Sheffield, and they have relaunched the trio. This had a feeling of celebration about it, and I think was also an anniversary concert for the organiser (Live at Sam's), so it chimed well with our own celebratory mood: and lots of tunes, lots of songs, some old friends (Spirit of Free Enterprise is absolutely not celebratory, but always welcome!), some new to me - a setting of Locks and Bolts to the tune of Lads of Alnwick, dissolving into the familiar tune...

Nonetheless, [personal profile] durham_rambler wanted a small celebration to thank his team of supporters (leaflet distibutors and one brave canvasser). This was of necessity held at short notice (wait for the election result, but as soon as possible thereafter) and this is a Bnk Holiday weekend: so the party ended up being a very small one indeed. I don't know what it says about this household that we had enough fizzy wine already in the cellar even before one of those well-wishers turned up with a bottle before going away for the weekend; but we had to go shopping to top up the supply of wine glasses! We also did some intensive dusting and vacuuming and moving of boxes in the sitting room, which is now looking almost presentable. We had a grand total of two guests, which is in my opinion an excellent number for a party, because you get to talk to everyone in some depth. Conversation was, quite properly, about the election, and what it will mean for Durham, and techniques for pushing leaflet through letterboxes, and gossip about local figures - and then veered off in an unexpected direction when the guest I knew less well removed her jacket and revealed a Sandman t-shirt...

Today we went to the VE Day anniversary celebrations in the Market Place: regard this as [personal profile] durham_rambler resuming his civic duties rather than any desire to commemmorate VE Day. Actually, I'd be happy to celebrate VE Day, and suggested that we should make a 'War is Over' placard to do just that: but as I had feared, the historical re-enactors present did not seem to have heard that news; and the band - well, it was too loud for me to listen in comfort. There were fewer stalls than I had expected, too, but we went round the market, and chatted to people (including the Parish Clerk, so [personal profile] durham_rambler gets his brownie point for showing up) and I bought a book from the bookstall.

On our way back to the car park, we called in at the People's Bookshop, where there was a small selection of hardbacks by Neil Gaiman, and a note saying 'if you want to read Gaiman without him profiting from it, buy secondhand' - I wasn't sure how to take this, but I selected a collection that I don't already have. So I discovered that the assistant who had written that note was a big fan...

Three celebrations and two conversations about Neil Gaiman: how's that for a themed post?
shewhomust: (puffin)
At the pub quiz lat night, we were talking about penguins. This isn't unusual: the Quizmaster is very fond of penguins, and was so appalled by the general ignorance revealed by a recent round of questions on the subject that he has declared that he will continue to ask questions about penguins until scores improve.

The finsl question of last night's quiz began "Which species of penguin..." and since we didn't know the answer, we were listing as many species as we could. Someone suggested the Humboldt penguin: "Ah," said our Scribe, "Humboldt Humboldt (and his little friend...)" I will never think of Lolita the same way again.

(The correct answer was 'Macaroni'.)
shewhomust: (Default)
J. gave me Judith Woolf's The Case of the Campus Cat for Christmas: J. doesn't read crime fiction, but Judith Woolf is a friend of hers... The publisher appears to be just a step or so away from self-publishing, but there was nothing amateurish about the presentation of the book: on the contrary, I was wary of a certain slickness, a sense of buttons being pressed. So the title - like the cover (I rather like the cat on the cover) - announces that this is a cat-related crime, itself a flourishing genre; the back cover presents the odd-couple detective team (she is a literary scholar, he is a ten year old maths prodigy, together they ...); and just to be on the safe side, she's a lesbian.

None of these elements is a bad thing, but I was relieved to discover that although they are all present in the book, that doesn't tell you much about what kind of book it is. And I'm not going to say much about that, either, because it would be mean to deprive readers of the pleasure of finding out. Two caveats, though. The first is that if you are, indeed, looking for a nice cosy mystery featuring a cat, you should be warned that the cat does not come out of this well. The second is that although I have described The Case of the Campus Cat as a murder mystery, the murder comes quite a long way into the book, and is solved only in a generic way. Most of the detective work, and most of the emotion, the suspense, concerns the abduction of a baby. This is disconcerting, and I don't think it's inadvertent: given that the person who spots the vital clue and finds the missing child is not any of the people who is actively investigating, surely Woolf is playing with the expectations of her readers? If you are looking for a classic mystery in which the Great Detective gathers the suspects in the library and explains his deductive process, look elsewhere. If. on the other hand, you want the unexpected, and would like to spend some time being both entertained and moved, then The Case of the Campus Cat is worth a try.

The murdered woman is an anthropologist, who has worked with the Kainu, a (presumably fictional) tribal people of South America. This is an important strand of the book, although not one that the publisher chooses to emphasise. So I will say only that, for a number of specific reasons, when I finished the book I picked up Peter Dickinson's Skin Deep / The Glass-Sided Ants' Nest, in which the surviving members of a tribe from New Guinea are living in a terraced house in London - and detective Jimmy Pibble is called in to investigate the murder of their chief. I'm always glad of an excuse to re-read Peter Dickinson, and this was far from my first re-read of The Glass-Sided Ants' Nest, so it's no surprise that I still like it just as much as I expected. More of a surprise, though, was that the parallel is even stronger than I thought: in addition to the importance of a tribal group with a traumatic event in their past, there's the rôle of a young boy who - oh, that would be telling. Not so much a parallel as an echo, perhaps, is the presence of an exclusive Christian group, Woolf's Sealed Brethren and Dickinson's Pure People.

Both books are recommended, then, but I'm surprised to find myself issuing so many content warnings (very much not my habit). The Glass-Sided Ants' Nest was published in 1968, and is told largely from the point of view of Jimmy Pibble, "ageing, unglamourous, greying towards retirement." I can discern no racial prejudice in his relations with the Ku, but the vocabulary in which he thinks of them was old-fashioned even by the standards of 1968 - and some of the minor characters are worse. They are presented as completely in the wrong, but if you are distressed by the very presence of the words, brace yourself.
shewhomust: (Default)
This is a long overdue post in invisible conversation with a friend's locked posts about a book we had both been reading. They had come to it through a recommendation from someone on DW; I had picked it off a charity shelf, knowing nothing about it but intrigued by the title. They were enthusiastic about it, and inspired to creativity; I was ambivalent, but inspired to read out great chunk of it to anyone who would listen.

It's a novel, I suppose, an odd sort of novel, but a beautifully written one: hence both the ambivalence and the urge to quote, at length. Maybe it's the very beauty of the writing that holds me at arm's length: instead of being drawn in to the narrative, I'm standing back, admiring the narration. The opening, too, discourages emotional involvement. The book opens with the heroine lying dead at the foot of a stone staircase, in some lofty Scottish baronial hall, under a stained glass window whose top panel depicts a cockatoo, "oddly attired" in her mother's black lace evening dress... So far, so gothic, but other passages describing a realistic small-town upbringing in post-war Scotland are, Maggie O'Farrell's introduction assures me, autobiographical. I think of it as A Portrait of the Artist as a young Titus Groan.

So I didn't at any point feel sad that Janet was going to die: I read that opening passage as a bravura piece of description and a statement that what Barker wants to write about is childhood and adolescence (which makes even more sense if she is looking back on her own childhood and adolescence). Once Janet is poised to leave the nest, the book is over: as much metamorphosis as death. But on the way there, there are many wonderful things, a heap of disconnected jewels. And here is one of them:

Now that Janet and Francis were older, Grandpa would let them visit him in his study, where the parrot lived. Grandpa came from a long line of parrot-keeping men, and Polly's predecessor, a white cockatoo, had fought with Wellington's armies in the Napoleonic Wars. Janet's father's earliest memories were of the astonishing oaths known to this bird, who was then a hundred and two years old and spoke in ripe gamey accents long since gone from the world of men. Grandpa believed Scotland there must be a fair number of such long-lived birds in - even perhaps in England - and it would be a fine thing to have them all gathered in a great dining hall, invoking ghostly midshipmen and dragoons, violent drinkers and merry rhymesters, perhaps even occasionally an elderly lady of refinement. This, he said, would afford a historical experience of rare value; indeed, ancient parrots should be feted and cultivated as true archivists.
shewhomust: (puffin)
I think I have mentioned that one of the quirks of the Elm Tree pub quiz is that we have a Book of the Moment: as a bonus for regular participants, the first question of the last round is always about whatever book we are working our way through at the time. If you read a chapter or so a week, and pay attention, you are pretty much guaranteed a correct answer.

As the end of the year approaches, so does the end of the current book, Swallows and Amazons. This was chosen by a vote from among titles suggested, and has not been an entirely popular choice. I'm not unhappy with it myself: the slow and careful reading doesn't do it any favours, but it's fun enough in its way. For whatever reason, though, the Quizmaster decided that he would take nominations, but would constitute himself an electoral college and his decision would be final.

He called for nominations for the next two Books of the Moment, the first to be more serious, the second lighter. To my surprise, I found it harder to think of a suitable suggestion for the serious option: I think of myself as, if anything, an excessively serious reader. Perhaps there were just too many candidates? At the last minute I proposed Susanna Clarke's Piranesi: I wasn't sure it would work, but it is such a good book.

And indeed, the Quizmaster told me later that he was very much enjoying reading it, but thought that the sort of questions he could have asked about it were just too detailed. I wasn't complaining, though, because he had already accepted my 'lighter' nomination, Frances Hardinge's Fly-by-Night. I am astonished, because I really didn't expect a children's fantasy to find favour; astonished, but delighted. The pleasure of a friend loving a book you have recommended to them, but dialled up to eleven.

I celebrated by reading Hardinge's The Forest of a Thousand Eyes, her second collaboration with illustrator Emily Gravett. The first one was good, but this one is just brilliant, and I would explain why at great length, but I have shopping to unpack and dinner to cook.
shewhomust: (mamoulian)
I wasn't planning to reread Five Red Herrings when we first visited Kirkcudbright. There were two reasons for this, and neither of them is sound.

I was wrong about the setting... )

...and I was wrong about the quality of the book. )
shewhomust: (guitars)
I was intrigued by [personal profile] sovay's post about this detective story, even before I registered what an apt coda it made to our recent adventures in Shropshire, Peters being, of course, a deeply Shropshire author. I had liked her Cadfael books well enough when I read them to have worked my way through most, if not all, of the series, but had never ventured into her other novels, and had no idea that she had set a murder mystery at a residential music college which is a hosting a week-end course on folk music.

"[A] residential music college" does not begin to describe Follymead. The opening of the novel is contrived to show it to the reader through the eyes of the astonished Liri. Two major aspects of the book each reveal the other, the singer and her reaction to the extraordinary location: the disproportionate grandeur of the gates, the full set of eighteenth century follies, the Grecian temple, the hermitage, the ruined tower ("No pagoda?" complains Liri, as the car rounds a corner and yes, there is the pagoda), the decoratively arched bridge over a river gleaming innocently like Chekhov's gun, the one element of genuine wildness in this artificial landscape... And then the house itself, a riot of towers and turrets and steeples and vanes - I enjoyed all of this enormously, and half-expected Michael Innes's Appleby to turn up. I cannot quite believe in it as a music college, especially a college in the ownership of the County Council. Peters offers some justification for this - the last of the family, for want of an heir, left it to the county with a handsome endowment fund, it operates under the aegis of a university - and plays up, too, quite how precarious it all is (the threat to Follymead is as urgent a concern of the narrative as any other) but even so... Ellis Peters was, says Carol Westron in an illuminating essay, passionate about education, "very active in the WEA (Workers' Educational Association) and helped to establish the Shropshire Adult Education College at Attringham Park. She also played a great part in setting up an Adult Education music college." In Follymead she gives free rein to a fantasy of a music college valued locally (Detective George Felse and his wife consider attending a forthcoming course on Mozart) and nationally.

If the book alloed the author to indulge in creating a fantasy music college, is the depiction of a folk music weekend similarly self-indulgent? She knows her ballads, and uses one of them for the scaffolding of her plot. ([personal profile] sovay recognised it ewven before the bog reveal, and identifies it as the version sung by Ewan MacColl: I defer to her expertise, and had to refer to the estimable Mainly Norfolk which offers achoice of variants.) But a passion for music and an eye for the potential of a balled do not add up to a love of folk music: maybe Liri is speaking for her author when she refuses the description "folk singer" as being ill-defined. "I'm not even sure I know exactly what a folk-singer is... About a ballad singer you can't be in much doubt, it's somebody who sings ballads. That's what I do ..."

How fortunate, then, that the story is set at a week-end course at which Professor Penrose will help us to examine the nature of folk music, with the promise of much debate, his record collection and some star live performances. I don't suppose Ellis Peters expected her background colour to be appealing enough that I am (at least) halfway to regretting that pesky murder investigation for getting in the way of some interesting music and talk, but there you go, that's what happened. The best I can do is to put it under a cut. At inordinate length, then: who's who, and who sings what? )

[Emerges, blinking, from the rabbit hole.]

[personal profile] sovay characterises as misdirection the use of a song - does it qualify as a balled? - to provide the nove's title. Indeed, and not just because Liri's vengeful rewrite invites the reader to anticpate an entirely different narrative to the one which eventually unfolds. It directs the reader's attention to the most obviously romantic pairing in the book, Liri and Lucien, the musical power couple between whom something has gone badly awry: contrast them with the rational observers, Tossa (short for Theodosia) and Dominic (Felse, son of the series detective, which is convenient), treading carefully through their a newly established relationship, and reflect that young couples tend to emerge well from the Cadfael books (this is from memory, but I'm pretty certain of it). Perhaps, then, the black-hearted true love is to be found in the third couple, the one introduced before the others, on the very first page ("only ine woman really existed in his life, and that was his wife.") There's a whole other post which grows from that reading, and considers the novel as it was surely intended to be considered, as a detective story. There's the character of the detrective to be considered, and whether he is a plausible policeman (to be set alongside the question of whether Cadfael is a plausible monk).

There's also a footnote about Ellis Peters' relationship with Czechoslovakia. But somebody stop me, before I launch into either of those...
shewhomust: (mamoulian)
In the Guardian, an article by writer Benjamin Myers considers how Durham - his "home town" - has changed "during 14 years of Tory rule". It's one of a short series on the theme, which strikes me as a little random, both the question itself and Myers's answer, but never mind. I liked: "Gone is the Marks & Spencer where I first discovered escalators and hummus."

There are a number of differences between the print and online versions of the article, starting from the headline, but let's not go down that rabbit hole; this post isn't about that, although the "escalators and hummus" made me feel (slightly) more tempted by Benjamin Myers's novel Cuddy.

This is Cuddy:

Cuddy


- more formally, Saint Cuthbert of Farne, as depicted by Fenwick Lawson, and stationed at Lindisfarne Priory. While I was waiting to show my card for admission to the priory, I overheard the custodian answering the ladies ahead of me: yes, that was where the bodies were found, the altar would have been just over there. And yes, the ruins had been in the care of English Heritage for quite some time, but it wasn't impossible to get in at night, you could climb over the wall from the garden of the pub, people did occasionally ... I wasn't unduly alarmed by this talk of bodies on altars, because I was pretty sure we were talking about a series of crime novels set on Holy Island: I had read the first few chapters of the first one, as a free sample somewhere, and felt no urge to get hold of and read the rest of it.

When my turn came, I asked the custodian, who confirmed that this was, indeed, what they were taoling about. He had read the books, he said, because he made a point of reading books about Holy Island, but he hadm't thought much of them. His preference was for non-fictionm he explained, but - and he produced his current reading matter - right now he was reading Benjamin Myers's Cuddy, and finding it quite dense going. But he persevered.

I was disproportionately cheered by this unscheduled book talk, and had to bite my tongue not to launch into enthusing about my own current reading (there were more visitors behind me, awaiting admission). I had already started Madeline Miller's Circe, which I had bought a dew days earlier in Berwick: I had been looking for her The Song of Achilles, which [personal profile] boybear had recomended, and found this instead. Without that pointer, I probably wouldn't have been tempted: the back cover quotes The Times: "Miller's Me-too era, kickass portrait of a woman trying to defy the men and Fates array against her ..." and I am not drawn to the feminist-retelling, all history must be the same, version of the past. I enjoy the strangeness, not the familiarity. Which only reinforces my belief that you should never look at the back cover until you are at least halfway through the book, because while Circe is, I suppose, as described, it also presents the Gods and Titans of myth in a way that was both entirely new and entirely familiar. I don't know enough about Greek myth to know how much is invention, how much has a Classical - or post-Classical - source, but it felt entirely convincing: as if it was both a single organic invention and the result of deep knowledge of its source material. It is, in short, one of those books that you want to talk to people about.
shewhomust: (bibendum)
When I was putting together this trip, my starting point was something I had seen about the Roman fortifications along the Cumbrian coast, which could be considered a continuation of Hadrian's Wall. It seemed ridiculous that we had spent so much time, one way and another, on Hadrian's Wall, but knew nothing about this "extension". The choice of Ravenglass was a bit more arbitrary. The name is irresistible, obviously. It has a Roman bath house; and I had been reading Martin Edwards' The Dungeon House, which is set here. Then, when I had made a booking, [personal profile] durham_rambler did some research of his own, and announced that it also has a steam railway. Suddenly, he was excited about this holiday, too, which has to be a good thing.

The Ravenglass and Eskdale Railway is a miniature steam railway which runs up the Esk valley from Ravenglass on the coast to Dalegarth, stopping just short of the village of Boot at the foot of Scafell. Or vice versa, because originally it was a mineral line, bringing rock and iron ore down from the quarry at the top. This morning we took a half-hour ride up the line, travelling first class (which means we had soft seats in a closed carriage) and got not the next but the next-but-one train back, which meant we had time at the top, at the catchily named Dalegarth for Boot, for a sandwich lunch and a look around the gift shop before we returned.

Here is our (outbound) driver, steering the engine (Northern Rock - there's a name from the past!) into the turning circle:

The end of the line


It's a pretty ride, with views of the river (running very high), and more of those decorative sheep (they must be Herdwicks, surely?), and primroses, and the very first bluebells. Back at Ravenglass, we dipped into the railway museum, and admired the engines with their polished brass and their glowing paintwork.

And then we considered the short walk to the Roman bath house. After all, it wasn't raining - not quite, not yet. That couldn't last, could it? Anyway, what I really wanted to do was come back to the hotel and make a cup of tea (or, in [personal profile] durham_rambler's case, go to the bar for a beer). And we're on holiday, so that's what we did.
shewhomust: (Default)
'Period Piece' -cover image

My friend John Brooker has put together a book of stories and other pieces written by his late father. His father (A. J. Brooker) wrote bits and pieces all his life and occasionally had something published - in Punch, for example. John inherited a big box of his writing and eventually, after (as he says in a final 'editor's note') reading the stories for 50 years, on and off, he thought it only fair to let other people have a look at them.

With the result that they are now available on Amazon, as a Kindle ebook and now also in paperback. Here's the Amazon solicitation:
"You're cheating", observed Savage Roche, pinning dealer's hand to the table with a fork. "If he's got less than five aces I'll apologise", he added.

Will Fred Montague default on his bets and face social ruin, or will Savage Roche break his neck?


As the editor explains in his Foreword, the title is no more than the truth: these stories are period pieces. A small number were set in the present day, though even the present day of writing has slipped into the past. "The present day narration may be in the 1950s or 1970s, but the author is always happiest in the mid-eighteenth century."

I'm not an expert on the eighteenth century, and I'm not going to comment on the authenticity of these tales. But I found them witty, cynical, at times macabre, and very more-ish. If that's the kind of thing you like, then you might like them too.

ETA: There's a 'read a sample' button on the Amazon page, which offers several complete stories ...
shewhomust: (bibendum)
I've been thinking about plans for a spring trip to Galloway, and about things I wanted to post about our visit there last summer. But this is not that post, because I was distracted, while sorting through some photos, by this glimpse of the house we rented in Pittenweem earlier that summer:

Self-portrait with bears


You could call it "Self-portrait with bears," and certainly it was the bears that caught my eye to begih with. You find all sorts of things in holiday cottages, and a soft toy or two isn't really surprising, but this abundance - bears and oels and hedgehogs, oh, my! - was exceptional. Then I noticed that one of the bears (the one waering purple satin) had fangs ...

But the real joy is the books. Not the Merriam-Webster, though you never know when you might need a thesaurus. I can't remember what the Alan Garner was, but the top two books in that pile are Joan Aiken's Night Birds on Nantucket and Diana Wynne Jones' Wilkins' Tooth. That's a well-furnished room.

Firsts

Jan. 7th, 2024 04:20 pm
shewhomust: (Default)
On Friday we attended our first funeral of the year: someone who was more than a neighbour, however long-standing, but not quite a friend. Long ago, we met him and his wife at the Sunday lunch / buffet / wine tastings conducted by our favourite restaurant (gone but not forgotten); more recently, he was the treasurer of our residents' association. We knew just enough of his life beyond this to know that when there was conflict between the schedules of the residents' group and the choir, his was one of the voices we could hear making music in the hall above our meeting room. So I wasn't surprised that the choir played a part in the funeral: but I had not known, for example, about the passion for trains...

On the way to the Farmers' Market in Sedgefield this morning, I saw the year's first rainbow: just a fuzzy stub of colour in a grey and drizzly sky, but welcome nonetheless.

First Farmers' Market of the year, too, and it too was just a promise of things to come - maybe hald the usual stalls, no baker (there are usually several), no cheesemaker... But it's worth the trip just for the winter veg. We supplemented this shopping with a visit to the Co-op: bananax, moustrap and - since they have a shelf of books on sale for a donation to charity - the first books: a biography of Kirsty MacColl, and Simon Hopkinson's Roast Chicken and Other Stories.
shewhomust: (mamoulian)
D. pressed on me a copy of Haruki Murakami's Norwegian Wood. I've heard much praise for it in the past, though never anything that made me want to read it: now seemed like the time to give it a try.

I found the first chapter heavy going: after that I got into the swing of it, and was absorbed enough that I have read it all in a couple of days: I wasn't expecting that. Still without enthusiasm, though.

On page 131 someone says to the narrator: "You've got this funny way of talking... Don't tell me you're trying to imitate that boy in The Catcher in the Rye?" and I thought "At last!" because I'd been thinking that this was The Catcher in the Rye, only at much greater length. Also, maybe Toru is nicer than Holden Caulfield: he thinks he's the weird one, rather than dismissing everyone else as phonies... (I wonder if he does have a funny way of talking. I can't tell.)

Adolescent angst. Life and death (mostly but not exclusively suicide); sex and (an inordinate amount of) alcohol. What am I not getting here? Because clearly I am missing something.

Two things I want to know. One, what happened to the character he calls the Storm Trooper? Yes, I suppose he illustrates how characters come into your life and then drift out of it, but I thought he deserved a point of view.

And two, why Norwegian Wood? I know it's Naoko's favourite Beatles song, and I know that having a favourite Beatles song tells us something about the place and time she lived in, but why that particular song? I'm fond of it, but I'd be deterred from proclaiming it my favourite by uncertainty about what happens in it, and why: was Naoko's English good enough to understand and be puzzled by the words, and to like that uncertainty, or did she just like the tune? Or the cryptic title? (I can see why it works better than most songs as the title of the novel, but it would be cheating for an author to wish it on his character for that reason, wouldn't it?)

I'm glad to have read it. I even quite enjoyed reading it, though not enough to want more Murakami.
shewhomust: (mamoulian)
I have a bee in my bonnet about so-called "cosy" crime fiction, so I was intrigued by the promise of an article on the subject in yesterday's Guardian. Inevitably, when I came to read the piece, it was about something completely different.

My rant goes something like this: when I started to read crime fiction, long ago, you could also refer to it as "detective fiction." There were variations, but mostly there were a group of people, someone would be murdered, and someone else would assume the task of examining the relationships between the survivors to find out which of them had both reason and ability to commit the crime. There were books in which the emphasis was on action, fear, suspense rather than motivation, but these were something slightly other (possibly thrillers). In the intervening period, the balance has changed, and now if you say "crime fiction," the reader will anticipate something noirish and violent. There may be a mystery to be solved, but equally all may be in the open, and the only question is who will survive and who will triumph. Classic, golden age type, stories in which the crime is a lens through which the characters and their world can be studied - these are regarded as "cosy" (which is to say, not very highly regarded at all). Once, at a crime fiction event, I asked a speaker, an expert on Scandi-noir, whether there was such a thing as Scandi-cosy? He said no, but he had to think quite hard about it: the question hadn't occurred to him before. The criticism, I think, is that "detective fiction" in this sense is cosy because by solving the crime, the detective restores order; such fiction is comforting, whereas noir crime is virtuous because it afflicts the comfortable. I think rather that tales of violence among gangsters, hard times on the margins, allow middle class readers (yes, like me) to feel that these are things that happen to other people; cosy crime brings murder and suspicion among people like us...

Anyway, the Guardian article considered cosy crime to be inherently light hearted, humorous. That's my Achilles heel right there, of course. "For my money," says author Oskar Jensen, "today’s greatest exponent of playful detective fiction is Alex Pavesi, whose Eight Detectives is a gloriously original, intricate and often very funny series of practical jokes played on the reader." [personal profile] boybear lent me a copy of Eight Detectives: I thought it clever, if cold-hearted and at times slightly macabre. It did not occur to me to consider it as humorous...

That aside, if crime is noir and cosy is funny, how am I to describe such classic crime as - well, I've just finished Ann Cleeves' (very early) Murder in Paradise. Perhaps I should go back to calling it "detective fiction."

Bonus link, from the same page: Tom Gauld's Christmas tree.
shewhomust: (puffin)
To the best of my never very reliable recollection, what was in my mind when I picked up this Puffin edition, in whichever charity shop it was, went along the lines that I had read The Magic Bedknob as a child, and that I had liked it less than The Borrowers, that the magic in it had not caught my imagination; but I had never read Bonfires and Broomsticks, and here was the combined edition, why not give it a whirl?

Bedknob )

tl;dr version: If you read The Magic Bedknob - and when I read it as a child I probably did - expecting the sort of story E. Nesbit wrote, in which a family of children explore all the possibilities of a magic talisman, you will be disappointed at the mere two magic journeys, one of them not all that magical. But read it for itself, for its characters and its wit, and it is much improved.

This is even more true of Part Two - the story originally published as Bonfires and Broomsticks. It is a single adventure, although the bed flies several times. It takes three chapters to reach the point of take-off, and again, you can regard this as an unconscionable amount of padding, or you can enjoy the children scheming to engineer their reunion with Miss Price, and then persuading her to allow one last adventure.

Broomstick )

tl;dr version: Goodness, I wasn't expecting that.

So now I should probably reread The Borrowers.
shewhomust: (watchmen)
I don't have anything coherent to say about A.S. Byatt. I have a vague affection for her, because I always enjoyed hearing this very literary grande dame praising Terry Pratchett. I enjoyed some of her books, struggled with others.

Instead, since today is the 70th birthday of Alan Moore, I thought it would be a pleasure to write about someone who is still alive. Admittedly, he has turned away from those of his works which have given me such pleasure over the years, but they have given me very great pleasure ...

And I've never written here about The Birth Caul... In fact, what have I written here? And why have I never tagged the relevant entries?

So instead of writing anything new, what I have been doing is tagging all my previous entries about Alan Moore. Not so much a birthday tribute as a meta-tribute. Oh, well.
shewhomust: (mamoulian)
A beautiful summer evening yesterday, clear and bright and still, and we went to Cullercoats for the launch of Ann Cleeves' new murder mystery, The Raging Storm.

The event was upstairs at the club, so we went to the Salt House next door for something to eat beforehand. I vaguely remember it as a burger joint, but it seems to have converted itself to a tapas bar. My usual experience with tapas is that there's something I really enjoy, and something else which I don't order, and wish I had: last night that was the chicken thighs with a creamy bean sauce, and the crab, respectively. A large glass of macabeo was plenty to see me through the evening, and I was happy not to have to contend with the queue at the bar (though [personal profile] durham_rambler, who had been abstemious with the wine, was disappointed).

Because yes, although we arrived at the club maybe a minute or so before the doors were scheduled to open, there was already a queue, and it took all of the half hour between then and the formal start time - and more - to get everyone into their seats. Which is very satisfactory, not only for the author, and the bookshop who organised it, but also for the RNLI: the book is dedicated to them, and the evening was a benefit event. Having already read the book, I knew that there was a connection there - the lifeboat is involved in the discovery of the first body (I don't think it's a spoiler to say that there's more than one murder...). But Ann had some stories to tell during the Q & A session which I hadn't heard before, including a daring lifeboat rescue off the island of Hillbre...

So that was fun, and then we drove home through deepening twilight: the sea still and luminous on our left, the moon hanging above us like a perfect lemon wedge in the sky.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     12 3
4 5678 910
111213 14151617
181920 21 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 03:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios