The taming of the Wordle
May. 6th, 2022 11:39 amThere has been correspondence recently in the Guardian in which the writers display the merits of their preferred Wordle start words. If you are dismissive of Wordle in general, or having a preferred start word - let alone writing to the Guardian about it - this post is not for you.
Where I took issue with the writers was that they were unanimous in triumph at the number of vowels they had managed to squeeze into a five letter word: ADIEU was one, for example. I can see why you might choose that strategy, but my own start word - yes, I admit it, I have a preferred start word, and although I experiment with others, I return to it - is all about the consonants. Four consonants and an E gives me a structure, and has just allowed me to solve the Wordle on my second attempt (why does Wordle refer to 'guesses'? I'm not guessing) two days in a row.
This post is not intended as a boast about my cleverness. When the system tells me I have three correct consonants incorrectly placed, it gives me quite a big hint about the correct placing, and frees my imagination to pick a random vowel. The rest is luck.
Title of this post provided by
durham_rambler's comment when I told him my start word: which is SHREW.
Where I took issue with the writers was that they were unanimous in triumph at the number of vowels they had managed to squeeze into a five letter word: ADIEU was one, for example. I can see why you might choose that strategy, but my own start word - yes, I admit it, I have a preferred start word, and although I experiment with others, I return to it - is all about the consonants. Four consonants and an E gives me a structure, and has just allowed me to solve the Wordle on my second attempt (why does Wordle refer to 'guesses'? I'm not guessing) two days in a row.
This post is not intended as a boast about my cleverness. When the system tells me I have three correct consonants incorrectly placed, it gives me quite a big hint about the correct placing, and frees my imagination to pick a random vowel. The rest is luck.
Title of this post provided by
no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 01:44 pm (UTC)I like hearing about people's strategies! Thanks for sharing yours. I've only very rarely gotten it on two--maybe three or four times out of many many times playing!
no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-06 10:51 pm (UTC)I think "guessing" is fairly common game/puzzle terminology for this sort of thing. I'd use the word that way: if there are multiple possible answers and you're trying one out, I'd say it's a guess but not a *blind* guess.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-07 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-07 03:17 pm (UTC)That's a nice distinction, re. guessing!
no subject
Date: 2022-05-08 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-05-08 08:58 pm (UTC)I, too, find the consonants much more important. The starting word I've been using for a while does have three vowels (and two common consonants); the word I almost always follow up with has one vowel and four consonants. Between these ten letters I generally have enough information to get it in one or two more tries. I'm willing to "waste" tries on words that couldn't possibly be right (because they don't use previous information) if they can provide new illumination.
My start word has an anagram; I chose the one I did to tease out valuable information about placement. That is, if my start word gives me a yellow on one of those consonants, that it is yellow and not green helps me figure out where it really goes. If, on the other hand, it were yellow in the anagram, that would leave more possibilities open.
This comment makes it sound like I'm much more serious about this than I am. I enjoy taking an engineering approach to it, but I'm not competitive or hard-core.
no subject
Date: 2022-05-09 11:14 am (UTC)I don't have a regular 'second try' - that's an interesting idea!