shewhomust: (Default)
shewhomust ([personal profile] shewhomust) wrote2018-11-28 04:41 pm

It is too late to begin

To the Lit & Phil on Monday to hear Nancy Campbell as part of the Books on Tyne Festival. The event was preceded by a frustrating visit to the Newcastle branch of Majestic; they had sent us a discount voucher as an incentive to resume buying wine from them (we stopped because they closed our local branch), and I wanted to put it towards ordering some wine to be delivered to the Bears, to make mulled wine for the carol evening. But as well as closing my branch, they have changed the tills, says the assistant, and now we have to phone an order through to the Holloway Road branch. So we spent our voucher on the Portuguese red with the wading bird on the label, and we might phone the Holloway Road, or we might phone the Wine Society... The event was followed, more satisfactorily, by dinner with S. We hadn't planned this, but since we were all there, we went to Mario's and S. told us about her recent holiday in Japan.

Nancy Cambell's event was linked to her book, Library of Ice (here's the Guardian's review). I had no idea whether I would like the book: there were things in the description that appealed to me, and things I thought I was likely to find irritating. Having heard her speak, I'm still not sure, but I will find out, because I was sufficiently intrigued to buy a copy. I enjoyed the talk, which started with her residency at the museum on Upernavik, a small island off the coast of Greenland, and went on from there to the scientists who are drilling deep into the ice of Antarctica (the resultant cores are the 'library of ice' of the title). I was going to call it 'beautifully constructed' until I realised that at one point she had realised she was overrunning, and apologised to someone in the audience for skipping a section which particularly interested them...

Rather than attempting to transcribe from memory my own highlights, I commend the author's website, which links to many good things. Here's a sample of her voice:
'Ilissiverupunga,' Grethe muttered. I'd only recently learnt the word. It meant 'Damn! I've put it away in a safe place and now I can't find it.'

Mornings at Upernavik Museum: an endless round of kaffe and conversation as local hunters dropped by to discuss ice conditions. Wishing to make progress in my research into Greenlandic literature, I'd asked Grethe, the museum director, whether she knew of any poetry books. But the bibliographic collections held mainly old black-and-white photographic records of the settlements, and kayaking manuals.

'Illilli!' Grethe called an hour or so later, 'There you are!' She emerged from a doorway almost obscured behind a stack of narwhal tusks and proudly presented me with a 1974 hymnbook, its homemade dust-wrapper culled from an offcut of pink wallpaper.

[From the essay No more words for snow]


And here's the book I really coveted, a Greenlandic alphabet produced as an artist's book, twelve words (because only twelve letters appear in the initial position in Greenlandic) and twelve images:

asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)

[personal profile] asakiyume 2018-11-29 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh my goodness. How wonderful. The book is beautiful, and I like that the funds are going to the World Oral Literature Project--which concept I also love.

Can I ask what things you thought you'd like and what things you thought you'd find irritating, and whether, when you heard her, it played out as you expected?

I like most everything about the book and her presentation, but I do feel rubbed the wrong way by the notion of "one word expresses a whole sentence," since where one decides to break up letters is arbitrary, and plenty of languages are agglutinative. But that's minor!
asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)

[personal profile] asakiyume 2018-11-30 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, I hear you loud and clear about people speaking for a place based on a mere brush with it. I'm very willing to listen to their reactions or impressions--but as their reactions and impressions, not as claims to the position of advocate for the place, or expert on the place.

It sounds from what you say as if in this case, the pluses of what the woman says and does outweighs the minuses, and I'm glad for that.